Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

City of New York v. Flatto

City of N.Y. v. Flatto, 271 N.Y. 662 (New York Court of Appeals 1936)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1936-06-05
Topic
general

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by providing that the defendant Flatto have costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the defendant Kittanning Sales Company, Inc. (See 271 N. Y. 244.)

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed City of New York v. Flatto. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by providing that the defendant Flatto have costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the defendant Kittanning Sales Company, Inc. (See 271 N. Y. 244.)