Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Bloom v. Crosson

Bloom v. Crosson, 82 N.Y.2d 768 (New York Court of Appeals 1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1993-10-07
Topic
international-arbitration

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered *771 in the negative for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (183 AD2d 341). Concur: Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith. Taking no part: Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Levine.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bloom v. Crosson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered *771 in the negative for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (183 AD2d 341).

Concur: Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith. Taking no part: Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Levine.