Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.

58 N.Y.2d 993

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1983-03-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “[Tjhere being no privity between the purchaser and the defendant there can be no implied warranty” under New York law
  • “there being no privity between the purchaser and the defendant [manufacturer] there can be no implied warranty.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
47 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*995 The Appellate Division properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The motion papers presented no question of fact for trial sufficient to negate the validity and binding effect of the disclaimer of warranty coverage. In addition, on the facts of this case, there being no privity between the purchaser and the defendant there can be no implied warranty.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.