Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Hoefers v. Jones
Hoefers v. Jones, 288 N.J. Super. 478 (New Jersey Superior Court 1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1996-03-08
- Topic
- general
288 N.J. Super. 478 (1996) 672 A.2d 1177 JANET LYNN HOEFERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. JONES, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hoefers v. Jones. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
JANET LYNN HOEFERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM H. JONES, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted February 21, 1996. Decided March 8, 1996.Before Judges PRESSLER, KEEFE and WEFING.
Louis D. Fletcher, attorney for appellant (Mr. Fletcher, of counsel; Michael R. Contarino, on the brief).
Ulrichsen, Amarel & Eory, attorneys for respondent (John S. Eory, on the brief).
*479 PER CURIAM.
The orders of the Chancery Division, Family Part, are affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Herman's opinion decided April 29, 1994.