Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Baldwin v. Division of Taxation
Baldwin v. Div. of Tax’n, 237 N.J. Super. 327 (New Jersey Superior Court 1990)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1990-01-02
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The judgment presented for review is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Andrew for the Tax Court which is published at 10 N.J. Tax 273 (Tax Ct.1988).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Baldwin v. Division of Taxation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
ROBERT R. BALDWIN AND CAROL A. BALDWIN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 19, 1989. Decided January 2, 1990.Before Judges ANTELL, BILDER and ASHBEY.
Julian F. Gorelli, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Julian F. Gorelli, on the brief).
Respondents argued the cause pro se.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment presented for review is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Andrew for the Tax Court which is published at 10 N.J. Tax 273 (Tax Ct. 1988).