Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Bacon v. American Insurance
Bacon v. Am. Ins., 138 N.J. Super. 550 (New Jersey Superior Court 1976)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1976-02-02
- Topic
- commercial
Per Curiam. The judgment below is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Rosenberg of the Superior Court, Law Division, 131 N. J. Super. 450.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bacon v. American Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
MARY G. BACON AND ROBERT H. BACON, PARTNERS TRADING UNDER THE NAME OF BACON & GRAHAM, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 21, 1976. Decided February 2, 1976.Before Judges CARTON, CRAHAY and HANDLER.
Mr. Robert H. Altshuler argued the cause for appellants.
*551 Mr. Richard D. Catenacci argued the cause for respondent (McElroy, Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Rosenberg of the Superior Court, Law Division, 131 N.J. Super. 450.