Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Apartment House Council v. Mayor & Council of Ridgefield
Apartment House Council v. Mayor & Council of Ridgefield, 128 N.J. Super. 192 (New Jersey Superior Court 1974)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1974-05-03
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge (now Justice) Pashman in his opinion reported at 123 N. J. Super. 87 (Law Div. 1973).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Apartment House Council v. Mayor & Council of Ridgefield. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
APARTMENT HOUSE COUNCIL, AN AFFILIATE OF THE NEW JERSEY BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD AND THE RIDGEFIELD MULTIPLE DWELLING EMERGENCY COMMISSION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 23, 1974. Decided May 3, 1974.Before Judges CARTON, LORA and SEIDMAN.
Mr. Jay M. Hollander argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Hutt & Berkow, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph R. Mariniello argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Fierro, Fierro & Mariniello, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge (now Justice) Pashman in his opinion reported at 123 N.J. Super. 87 (Law Div. 1973).