Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Traverso v. McMillin

16 Stock. 308

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1927-05-16
Topic
general

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12. For reversal — None. *Page 309

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Traverso v. McMillin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

*Page 309