Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Stawicki v. Kelly
115 N.J.L. 190
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1935-05-17
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stawicki v. Kelly. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.