Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Hurtado
113 N.J. 1
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1988-11-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- Although police could temporarily detain defendant before issuing summons, subsequent warrantless arrest and detention for misdemeanor were unlawful
- “The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed ... substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Skillman”
- discussing authority of police to arrest for municipal ordinance violation
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Hurtado. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 16 opinions
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, the matter is remanded to the trial court to permit defendant to retract his guilty plea, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Skillman, reported at 219 N.J.Super. 12, 23 (1987).
For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed —None.