Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Clay
State v. Clay, 118 N.J. 251 (N.J. 1990)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1990-04-03
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 230 N.J.Super. 509, 553 A.2d 1356 (1989). For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7. Opposed — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Clay. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 230 N.J.Super. 509, 553 A.2d 1356 (1989).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — None.