Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Carrigan
94 N.J.L. 566
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1920-06-14
- Topic
- general
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court. For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7. For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Carrigan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.
For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.