Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Anderson
93 N.J. 14
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1983-05-06
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 174 (1982). For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI — 7. For reversal —None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Anderson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 21 opinions
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 174 (1982).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI — 7.
For reversal —None.