Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Acker
134 N.J. 485
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1993-09-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that prosecutors are not permitted to characterize defense attorney and defense as “outrageous, remarkable, absolutely preposterous and absolutely outrageous”
- holding prosecutor's summation in which he called defendants "animals" and "brutes" reversible error where such statements were not part of any testimony
- condemning a warning by the prosecutor to the jury about not doing its job
- written policy allowing outside carriers to bid on bus routes not an exempted intra-agency statement but a rule establishing policy applicable to an industry
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Acker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 29 opinions
134 N.J. 485 (1993) 634 A.2d 522
STATE
STATE
v.
ACKER
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
September 10, 1993.Petitions for Certification
Denied.