Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Acker

134 N.J. 485

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1993-09-10
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that prosecutors are not permitted to characterize defense attorney and defense as “outrageous, remarkable, absolutely preposterous and absolutely outrageous”
  • holding prosecutor's summation in which he called defendants "animals" and "brutes" reversible error where such statements were not part of any testimony
  • condemning a warning by the prosecutor to the jury about not doing its job
  • written policy allowing outside carriers to bid on bus routes not an exempted intra-agency statement but a rule establishing policy applicable to an industry

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Acker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
29 opinions
134 N.J. 485 (1993) 634 A.2d 522

STATE
v.
ACKER

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

September 10, 1993.

Petitions for Certification

Denied.

265 N.J. Super. 351 627 A.2d 170