Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Seidel v. Board of Education, Ventnor City
111 N.J.L. 240
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1933-09-27
- Topic
- general
*241 Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the 'Supreme Court, and reported in 110 N. J. L. 31.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Seidel v. Board of Education, Ventnor City. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
*241 Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the 'Supreme Court, and reported in 110 N. J. L. 31.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Case, Bodine, Donges, IIei-ier, Perskie, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.