Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Schock v. Board of Review
Schock v. Bd. of Rev., 48 N.J. 121 (N.J. 1966)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1966-11-07
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- claimant-truck driver found disqualified by reason of misconduct as a result of leaving the company truck unattended with its motor running and going into a tavern for a beer
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schock v. Board of Review. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
The opinion of the court was delivered
Per Curiam.The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny for the majority of the Appellate Division. 89 N. J. Super. 118 (App. Div. 1965). See also: Sarja v. Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation, Minn., 144 N. W. 2d 377 (1966).
The Chief Justice and Justices Jacobs and Proctor dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in the dissent of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Justices Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 4.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs and Proctor — 3.