Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Roll v. Timberman
50 N.J. 84
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1967-06-30
- Topic
- general
50 N.J. 84 (1967) CHARLES EDWARD ROLL, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BRUCE E. TIMBERMAN, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS AND TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CORA E. MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Roll v. Timberman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
50 N.J. 84 (1967)
CHARLES EDWARD ROLL, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
CHARLES EDWARD ROLL, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
BRUCE E. TIMBERMAN, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS AND TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CORA E. MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
June 30, 1967.Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille and Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr. for the petitioner.
Messrs. Orlando & Cummins and Messrs. McCord, Farrell, Eynon & Munyon for the respondents.
Denied.