Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Reade v. McKenna
Reade v. McKenna, 16 Stock. 304 (N.J. 1927)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1927-05-16
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The circumstances of the case are fully set out in the opinion filed by the learned vicemhancellor, ubi supra. In our view it is sufficient for an affirmance to say that his finding that the contract had been abandoned by mutual assent of the defendant and the authorized agent of complainant, is fully justified by the evidence. This makes it unnecessary to go into the other phases of the case. The decree will be affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Reade v. McKenna. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The circumstances of the case are fully set out in the opinion filed by the learned vicemhancellor, ubi supra. In our view it is sufficient for an affirmance to say that his finding that the contract had been abandoned by mutual assent of the defendant and the authorized agent of complainant, is fully justified by the evidence. This makes it unnecessary to go into the other phases of the case.
The decree will be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Van Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ.‘ 12.
For reversal — None.