Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
53 N.J. 7
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1968-11-25
- Topic
- litigation
Pee Ctjriam:. The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 456. For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaneMAN - 7.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
Pee Ctjriam:.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 456.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaneMAN - 7.
For reversal — Hone.