Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Parker v. Goldstein
Parker v. Goldstein, 40 N.J. 225 (N.J. 1963)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1963-05-13
- Topic
- general
40 N.J. 225 (1963) RAY PARKER, ADMINISTRATOR, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. SAMUEL L. GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANT, AND HARRY BOFFMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. May 13, 1963.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Parker v. Goldstein. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
40 N.J. 225 (1963)
RAY PARKER, ADMINISTRATOR, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
RAY PARKER, ADMINISTRATOR, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
SAMUEL L. GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANT, AND HARRY BOFFMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 13, 1963.Messrs. Balk and Jacobs and Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof for the petitioner.
Messrs. Gaffey and Webb, Mr. Samuel P. Orlando and Mr. Aaron Dines for the respondent.
Denied.