Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
O'Neill v. O'Neill
127 N.J. Eq. 278
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1940-04-25
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery denying the application of the complainant wife for . an increase of alimony. At the foot of the decree provision is made that either party, contingent upon a change of circumstances of either, may seek a modification of the decree in the future. On the sparse record before us we conclude that the finding of the learned advisory master had proper regard for the condition and station in life of the complainant and the ability of the defendant to pay. We are in accord with the conclusion at which he arrived.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed O'Neill v. O'Neill. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery denying the application of the complainant wife for . an increase of alimony. At the foot of the decree provision is made that either party, contingent upon a change of circumstances of either, may seek a modification of the decree in the future.
On the sparse record before us we conclude that the finding of the learned advisory master had proper regard for the condition and station in life of the complainant and the ability of the defendant to pay. We are in accord with the conclusion at which he arrived.
The decree will be affirmed.
For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Persicie, Porter, Ueteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 11.
For modification — Donges, Heher, JJ. 2.