Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Moran v. Moore-Mccormack Lines

132 N.J.L. 171

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1944-09-14
Topic
general

*172 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be .affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court. For affirmance■ — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 10. For reversal — Hbher, Raeeertt, Dill, JJ. ' 3.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moran v. Moore-Mccormack Lines. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*172 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be .affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance■ — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Hbher, Raeeertt, Dill, JJ. ' 3.