Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Miller v. I. P. Thomas & Son Co.

Miller v. I. P. Thomas & Son Co., 89 N.J.L. 364 (N.J. 1916)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1916-06-19
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Parker,o Minturn, Nalisch, Black, White, Ter-HUNE, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 13. For reversal—None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Miller v. I. P. Thomas & Son Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Parker,o Minturn, Nalisch, Black, White, Ter-HUNE, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 13.

For reversal—None.