Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mergel v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.
22 N.J. 453
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1956-11-13
- Topic
- general
22 N.J. 453 (1956) 126 A.2d 392 SOPHIE MERGEL, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. November 13, 1956. Mr.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mergel v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
22 N.J. 453 (1956) 126 A.2d 392
SOPHIE MERGEL, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
SOPHIE MERGEL, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
November 13, 1956.Mr. Robert C. Gruhin and Mr. Morris Edelstein for the petitioner.
Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy & Connell for the respondent.
Denied.