Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

McMahon v. American Railway Express Company

McMahon v. Am. Ry. Express Co., 105 N.J.L. 494 (N.J. 1929)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1929-02-04
Topic: general

Pee Cueiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiebk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McMahon v. American Railway Express Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiebk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.