Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.
Mayflower Indus. v. Thor Corp., 9 N.J. 605 (N.J. 1952)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1952-06-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “What a person’s intentions were need not be proved from what he said, but they may be inferred from all that he did and said, and from all the surrounding circumstances of the situation under investigation.”
- interference with proposed distributorship agreement by threats of groundless litigation
- "[A] person's intentions . . . need not be proved from what he said[] but . . . may be inferred from all that he di d and said, and from all the surrounding circumstances of the situation under investigation."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 74 opinions
Per Curiam.
The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Erancis in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenpeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan —6.
For reversal — None.