Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Martin v. Kimball

Martin v. Kimball, 1 Stock. 432 (N.J. 1916)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1916-11-20
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in -the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Hee-EENHEIMBR, TAYLOR, GARDNER-12. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Martin v. Kimball. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in -the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Hee-EENHEIMBR, TAYLOR, GARDNER-12.

For reversal — None.