Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker, 102 N.J. Eq. 328 (N.J. 1928)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1928-02-06
Topic
general

Pee Cueiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 224. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 15.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 224.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.