Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ligenza v. White Foundry Co., Inc.

137 N.J.L. 610

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1948-09-03
Topic
general

*611 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court. For affirmance —■ The Chancellob, Ciiiee Justice, Bodine, Hehee, Waciieneeld, Bubling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Fbeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ligenza v. White Foundry Co., Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*611 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —■ The Chancellob, Ciiiee Justice, Bodine, Hehee, Waciieneeld, Bubling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Fbeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.