Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Lebkuecker v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Lebkuecker v. Pa. R.R., 98 N.J.L. 271 (N.J. 1922)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1922-10-06
Topic: general

Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbaeh in the Supreme Court. For affirm,anee — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 18. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lebkuecker v. Pennsylvania Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbaeh in the Supreme Court.

For affirm,anee — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 18.

For reversal — None.