Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kowalski v. Hines

Kowalski v. Hines, 96 N.J.L. 293 (N.J. 1921)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1921-06-20
Topic
general

Fee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliscli in the Mupreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cujee Justice, Hwayze, Trench aed, Parker, Minturn. Kaxzhnbacti, HeppenniiTirer, Wirliams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kowalski v. Hines. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Fee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliscli in the Mupreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cujee Justice, Hwayze, Trench aed, Parker, Minturn. Kaxzhnbacti, HeppenniiTirer, Wirliams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For ¡eveisal—"White, J. 1.