Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
In Re Yormark
In Re Yormark, 60 N.J. 175 (N.J. 1972)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1972-02-07
- Topic
- general
Pee Curiam. The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Yormark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N. J. 138 (1972).
The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.
We are advised that respondent intends to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.
For disbarment—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.
Opposed—Hone.