Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
In Re Romaine
115 N.J. Eq. 172
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1934-01-05
- Topic
- bankruptcy
The orders appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fallon, and reported in 113 N.J. Eq. 477. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15. For reversal — None. *Page 173
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Romaine. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The orders appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fallon, and reported in 113 N.J. Eq. 477. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 173