Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Patel

In re Patel, 182 N.J. 587 (N.J. 2005)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 2005-03-09
Topic: estate-planning

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-261, concluding that C. AARON PATEL, *588a/k/a CHIRAYU A. PATEL, of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a)(negligent misappropriation of trust funds) and RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with recordkeeping requirements of R. 1:21-6), and good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that C. AARON PATEL, a/k/a CHIRAYU A. PATEL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Patel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-261, concluding that C. AARON PATEL, *588 a/k/a CHIRAYU A. PATEL, of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a)(negligent misappropriation of trust funds) and RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with recordkeeping requirements of R. 1:21-6), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that C. AARON PATEL, a/k/a CHIRAYU A. PATEL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.