Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Daniecki

119 N.J. Eq. 359

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1936-01-31
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 117 N. J. Eq. 527. For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Daniecki. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 117 N. J. Eq. 527.

For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.