Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Harz v. Board of Commerce & Navigation

127 N.J. Eq. 341

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1940-04-25
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 126 N. J. Eq. 9. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Welds, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harz v. Board of Commerce & Navigation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 126 N. J. Eq. 9.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Welds, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.