Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ferber v. Cona

Ferber v. Cona, 91 N.J.L. 688 (N.J. 1918)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1918-01-31
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ferber v. Cona. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.