Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company
113 N.J.L. 399
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1934-09-27
- Topic
- general
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Deae, JJ. 9. For reversal — Case, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Deae, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Case, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.