Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Danek v. Hommer
Danek v. Hommer, 15 N.J. 573 (N.J. 1954)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1954-06-14
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- in deciding whether there is a potential for coverage, doubts should be resolved in favor of the insured
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Danek v. Hommer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 135 opinions
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.
Heher, J., concurring in result.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.
For reversal — None.