Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Danek v. Hommer

Danek v. Hommer, 15 N.J. 573 (N.J. 1954)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1954-06-14
Topic
litigation

in deciding whether there is a potential for coverage, doubts should be resolved in favor of the insured

Citator

Cited by
42 opinions
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

Heher, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.