Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Chorpenning v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden

115 N.J. Eq. 170

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1934-01-05
Topic
general

Pee Cueiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Davis, and reported in 113 N. J. Eq. 389. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Pakkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Chorpenning v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Davis, and reported in 113 N. J. Eq. 389.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Pakkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.