Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Brooks v. City of Orange

Brooks v. City of Orange, 61 N.J. 576 (N.J. 1972)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1972-12-04
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

3 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brooks v. City of Orange. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 12 opinions

BROOKS,ET AL.v. CITY OF ORANGE,ET AL.,,61 N.J. 576(1972)

J. FRANK BROOKS,ET AL.,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ORANGE,ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 20, 1972 —

Decided December 4, 1972.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.Page 577

Mr. Samuel A. Gennetargued the cause for appellants (Mr.John Methfessel, on the brief;Messrs. Gennet and Methfessel, attorneys).Mr. Maurice B. McLaughlinargued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Galvin and McLaughlin, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

Certification was granted in this matter,60 N.J. 514(1972), and also inJ.H.M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville,60 N.J. 471(1972), also decided this day,61 N.J. 577, to permit consideration of the doctrine ofReimann v. MonmouthConsolidated Water Co.,9 N.J. 134(1952), andSydneyGrossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.,27 N.J. 91(1958). We are not persuaded to depart from those decisions and hence the judgment herein is affirmed.For affirmance— Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 6.For reversal— None.