Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

7 Stock. 277

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1920-10-21
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan. For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Herpentieimer, Ackerson—10. For reversal—None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Herpentieimer, Ackerson—10. For reversal—None.