Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bowlby v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

Bowlby v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 56 Vroom 725 (N.J. 1914)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1914-03-16
Topic: general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Kalis cii, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Cong-don, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bowlby v. Board of Chosen Freeholders. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Kalis cii, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Cong-don, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.