Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bederski v. Policemen's & Firemen's Pension Board of Newark

Bederski v. Policemen's & Firemen's Pension Bd. of Newark, 104 N.J.L. 163 (N.J. 1927)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1927-10-17
Topic
general

*164 Pee Cueiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Paekek, Mintukn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah. Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bederski v. Policemen's & Firemen's Pension Board of Newark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*164 Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Paekek, Mintukn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah. Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.