Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ballinger v. City of Burlington

123 N.J.L. 227

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1939-09-22
Topic
general

*228 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKbil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14. For reversal — -Hone.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ballinger v. City of Burlington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*228 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKbil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -Hone.