Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
A. Fishman Hat Company v. Rosen
106 N.J.L. 567
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1929-05-20
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchaed, Parker, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiric, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12. For reversal — Hone.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed A. Fishman Hat Company v. Rosen. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchaed, Parker, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiric, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.