Opinion · Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Moore

State v. Moore, 94 N.C. App. 55 (N.C. Ct. App. 1989)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1989-06-06
Topic
general

Judge BECTON concurring in the result. Because, and only because, of our Supreme Court’s holdings in State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201, 362 S.E. 2d 244 (1987), and State v. Smith, 321 N.C. 290, 362 S.E. 2d 159 (1987), I am compelled to concur in the result.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Moore. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Judge BECTON

concurring in the result.

Because, and only because, of our Supreme Court’s holdings in State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201, 362 S.E. 2d 244 (1987), and State v. Smith, 321 N.C. 290, 362 S.E. 2d 159 (1987), I am compelled to concur in the result.