Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Russell

185 N.C. 611

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1923-05-26
Topic
general

Pee Oubiam. On the trial the controversy narrowed itself to questions of fact, all of wbieb have been settled by the verdict. After a careful perusal of the record, we are convinced tbat the case bas been tried in substantial conformity to the law as bearing on the subject, and we bave found no sufficient reason for disturbing the result below. No error.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Russell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Pee Oubiam.

On the trial the controversy narrowed itself to questions of fact, all of wbieb have been settled by the verdict. After a careful perusal of the record, we are convinced tbat the case bas been tried in substantial conformity to the law as bearing on the subject, and we bave found no sufficient reason for disturbing the result below.

No error.