Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Robbins

State v. . Robbins, 78 N.C. 431 (N.C. 1878)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1878-01-05
Topic
general

Faircloth, J. After hearing and considering the conflicting evidence, the. jury by their verdict have said the defendants "were guilty. No error in the conduct of the action has been pointed out to us, and we are unable to discover any in the record. Let this be certified in order that judgment may be pronounced. No error.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Robbins. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
STATEv. ROBBINS,78 N.C. 431(1878)
STATE v. JOHN P. ROBBINS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(January Term, 1878.)
Indictment — Assault and Battery — Judge's Charge.

Where on the trial of an indictment for an assault and battery, committed upon the prosecutor, a school teacher while engaged in his school, the court charged the jury that "if the defendant went to the schoolhouse for a lawful purpose, and after he got there he brought on the affray by any language or conduct of his own, he would be guilty":Held, not to be error.
ASSAULT and battery, tried at Fall Term, 1877, of WATAUGA, beforeCloud,J.

The defendant and his three sons were indicted for an assault upon one Purley. The prosecutor testified, among other things, that he was teaching a common school under a contract with two of the school committee of the district; that the defendant, who was the other member of said committee, upon passing the schoolhouse, went to the door thereof and inquired of the witness what he was doing; he (432) informed him he was teaching school, having been employed by the other two committeemen; that defendant denied this statement andPage 290called the witness a liar, and the witness struck him and knocked him out of the door. There was much other evidence tending to show that the parties cursed each other, and that the prosecutor also called the defendant a liar. His Honor in his charge to the jury said: "If the defendant went to the schoolhouse for a lawful purpose, and after he got there he brought on the affray by any language or conduct of his own, he would be guilty." (SeeS. v. Perry,50 N.C. 9.) Defendant excepted. Verdict of guilty as to two of the defendants. Judgment. Appeal by defendants.
Attorney-General and G. N. Folk for the State.No counsel for the defendants.
FAIRCLOTH, J.
After hearing and considering the conflicting evidence, the jury by their verdict have said the defendants were guilty. No error in the conduct of the action has been pointed out to us, and we are unable to discover any in the record. Let this be certified in order that judgment may be pronounced.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.Cited: S. v. Davis,80 N.C. 353;Saunders v. Gilbert,156 N.C. 475.

(433)