Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Rashidi

360 N.C. 166

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Date: 2005-12-16
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Rashidi. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

STATE v. RASHIDI,360 N.C. 166(2005)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MASOUD RASHIDI.

No. 510A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,___ N.C. App. ___,617 S.E.2d 68(2005), finding no prejudicial error in judgments entered 15 August 2003 by Judge Yvonne Mims Evans in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 December 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Alexandra M. Hightower,Assistant Attorney General, for the State.Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S.Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, fordefendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.Page 167